PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCD vs. ECCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCD vs. ECCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 27.07% return, which is significantly higher than ECCC's 1.93% return.


CCD

1D
-1.08%
1M
4.92%
YTD
27.07%
6M
26.73%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
14.37%

ECCC

1D
0.29%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.93%
6M
7.38%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCD vs. ECCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCD
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund
27.07%-4.26%35.89%7.98%-28.00%4.61%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
1.93%16.21%14.03%14.18%-13.45%5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CCD and ECCC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCD:

$109.16M

ECCC:

$162.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCD:

$84.83M

ECCC:

$143.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCD:

$109.15M

ECCC:

-$35.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCD vs. ECCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCD
CCD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ECCC
ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCD vs. ECCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCDECCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.78

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

10.44

+6.38

CCD vs. ECCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCD Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the ECCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCD and ECCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCDECCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.45

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.58

-0.16

Drawdowns

CCD vs. ECCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, which is greater than ECCC's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and ECCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCDECCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.42%

-19.16%

-36.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-4.29%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-6.88%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.04%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-3.72%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.55%

+0.95%

Volatility

CCD vs. ECCC - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) at 4.17%. This indicates that CCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCDECCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

4.17%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

8.37%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

11.24%

+6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

12.24%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

12.24%

+13.64%

Dividends

CCD vs. ECCC - Dividend Comparison

CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than ECCC's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCD
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund
9.13%11.22%9.63%11.83%11.42%7.43%7.11%8.93%12.21%9.99%11.43%7.40%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6.61%6.55%7.10%7.81%7.95%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCD vs. ECCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
11.79M
-12.96M
(CCD) Total Revenue
(ECCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCD and ECCC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCD has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to ECCC (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCD dropped -55.42% vs ECCC's -19.16%.

CCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCD and ECCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer