CCD vs. TLTW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW).

TLTW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD). It was launched on Jun 18, 2022.

Performance

CCD vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCD vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund	4.16%	-4.26%	35.89%	7.98%	-9.90%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	1.44%	11.36%	-2.18%	0.73%	-11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.44% return.

CCD

• 1D: 4.91%
• 1M: -6.38%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 6M: 7.08%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 1.77%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

TLTW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 0.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CCD vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCD

CCD Risk / Return Rank: 60
CCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CCD Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CCD Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TLTW

TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 48
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCD vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCD	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.84	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.17	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.15	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	1.42	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	3.74	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCD vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCD and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCD	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	0.84	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	-0.03	+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CCD and TLTW is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCD vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, less than TLTW's 13.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund	10.96%	11.22%	9.63%	11.83%	11.42%	7.43%	7.11%	8.93%	12.21%	9.99%	11.43%	7.40%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	13.66%	14.82%	14.47%	19.59%	8.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CCD vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and TLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCD	TLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.42%	-18.61%	-36.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-5.80%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.71%	-2.98%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.00%	-8.49%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	2.20%	+2.74%

Volatility

CCD vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 3.46%. This indicates that CCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCD	TLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.75%	3.46%	+5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	5.80%	+7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.89%	8.91%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.13%	11.55%	+8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.75%	11.55%	+14.20%