PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSZIX vs. MLOZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CSZIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.22%
6M
15.37%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
6.96%
ALL TIME*
7.76%

MLOZX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSZIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z
16.37%4.41%6.81%13.26%-26.21%41.81%-1.64%31.95%-4.17%8.18%
MLOZX
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.
32.43%17.35%12.16%10.49%21.10%39.09%-26.70%12.62%-13.43%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CSZIX and MLOZX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between CSZIX and MLOZX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSZIX vs. MLOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSZIX
CSZIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CSZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CSZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MLOZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSZIXMLOZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSZIXMLOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSZIXMLOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSZIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MLOZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSZIX vs. MLOZX - Dividend Comparison

CSZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than MLOZX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSZIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z
3.25%3.81%2.85%3.00%7.77%4.38%5.47%7.70%3.68%2.60%5.90%22.32%
MLOZX
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.
1.45%1.71%10.24%4.61%3.66%3.08%6.57%6.21%4.44%3.86%3.72%6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSZIX and MLOZX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSZIX and MLOZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer