CSZIX vs. HLRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX).
CSZIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014. HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002.
Performance
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 1.50% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 13.26% | -26.21% | 41.81% | -1.64% | 31.95% | -4.17% | 8.18% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 3.75% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSZIX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CSZIX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.00% annualized return.
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -1.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSZIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSZIX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSZIX
HLRRX
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSZIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | -0.06 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.02 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.13 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | -0.34 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSZIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | -0.06 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.19 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.32 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSZIX and HLRRX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
CSZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than HLRRX's 7.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.10% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.74% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Drawdowns
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSZIX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, smaller than the maximum HLRRX drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSZIX and HLRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSZIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -62.78% | +20.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -11.74% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.05% | -28.99% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -48.13% | +5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -12.54% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -8.52% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 4.33% | -1.37% |
Volatility
CSZIX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 3.62%. This indicates that CSZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSZIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.62% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 8.74% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 15.53% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 17.55% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 20.80% | -0.01% |