MLOZX vs. STLG

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

MLOZX (Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.) and STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) are both funds - MLOZX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Cohen & Steers, while STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MLOZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for STLG.

Performance

MLOZX vs. STLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MLOZX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

STLG

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 12.20%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 28.45%
• 5Y*: 17.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	$24.51M	$25.86M	$22.91M

MLOZX vs. STLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	32.43%	17.35%	12.16%	10.49%	21.10%	39.09%	-27.88%
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	15.59%	21.49%	37.42%	42.86%	-26.75%	27.99%	26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and STLG is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020	0.37

The correlation between MLOZX and STLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLOZX vs. STLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLOZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

STLG

STLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLOZX vs. STLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLOZX	STLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.90	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.29	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MLOZX	STLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.34%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.40%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.28%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLOZX	STLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.76%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.29%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.91%	—

MLOZX vs. STLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLOZX vs. STLG - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than STLG's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	1.45%	1.71%	10.24%	4.61%	3.66%	3.08%	6.57%	6.21%	4.44%	3.86%	3.72%	6.05%
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	0.27%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLOZX and STLG in my portfolio?

MLOZX and STLG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.