MLOZX vs. FNARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. FNARX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 1997.
Performance
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund | 28.78% | 28.67% | 3.76% | 6.41% | 41.01% | 39.34% | -20.86% | 19.09% | -24.28% | -0.11% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLOZX having a 27.86% return and FNARX slightly higher at 28.78%. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has underperformed FNARX with an annualized return of 11.89%, while FNARX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.63% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
FNARX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 28.78%
- 6M
- 33.09%
- 1Y
- 51.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 25.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FNARX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. FNARX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
FNARX
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | FNARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.40 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 2.93 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.97 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 13.95 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | FNARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.40 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.01 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and FNARX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FNARX's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund | 1.47% | 1.89% | 1.51% | 1.60% | 2.42% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.42% | 1.17% | 1.38% | 0.62% | 0.78% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FNARX drawdown of -71.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and FNARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | FNARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -71.04% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -16.94% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -29.93% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -64.10% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.38% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -20.15% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.61% | +0.01% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. FNARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.54%, while Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | FNARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.02% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 14.01% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 21.77% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 25.17% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 27.08% | -2.91% |