MLOZX vs. FNARX

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

MLOZX (Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.) and FNARX (Fidelity Natural Resources Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MLOZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for FNARX.

Performance

MLOZX vs. FNARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MLOZX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FNARX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 8.50%
• 6M: 10.14%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 1Y: 38.16%
• 3Y*: 17.78%
• 5Y*: 23.14%
• 10Y*: 10.87%
• ALL TIME*: 8.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MLOZX vs. FNARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	32.43%	17.35%	12.16%	10.49%	21.10%	39.09%	-26.70%	12.62%	-13.43%	0.33%
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	23.73%	28.67%	3.76%	6.41%	41.01%	39.34%	-20.86%	19.09%	-24.28%	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and FNARX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013	0.83

The correlation between MLOZX and FNARX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLOZX vs. FNARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLOZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNARX

FNARX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FNARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FNARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNARX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FNARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FNARX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLOZX vs. FNARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLOZX	FNARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.16	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MLOZX	FNARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-71.04%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.10%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.99%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLOZX	FNARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.08%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.82%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	26.80%	—

MLOZX vs. FNARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FNARX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLOZX vs. FNARX - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FNARX's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	1.77%	1.89%	1.51%	1.60%	2.42%	1.46%	1.79%	1.42%	1.17%	1.38%	0.62%	0.78%
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	1.45%	1.71%	10.24%	4.61%	3.66%	3.08%	6.57%	6.21%	4.44%	3.86%	3.72%	6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLOZX and FNARX in my portfolio?

MLOZX and FNARX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.