PortfoliosLab logo
MLOZX vs. FDFIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and FDFIX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MLOZX:

-0.07

FDFIX:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

MLOZX:

-0.02

FDFIX:

1.04

Omega Ratio

MLOZX:

1.00

FDFIX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MLOZX:

-0.12

FDFIX:

0.69

Martin Ratio

MLOZX:

-0.38

FDFIX:

2.62

Ulcer Index

MLOZX:

6.66%

FDFIX:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

MLOZX:

20.85%

FDFIX:

19.78%

Max Drawdown

MLOZX:

-72.28%

FDFIX:

-33.77%

Current Drawdown

MLOZX:

-8.02%

FDFIX:

-3.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than FDFIX's 1.03% return.


MLOZX

YTD

-1.54%

1M

7.98%

6M

-7.92%

1Y

-1.53%

3Y*

5.27%

5Y*

16.62%

10Y*

2.10%

FDFIX

YTD

1.03%

1M

6.31%

6M

-1.39%

1Y

14.42%

3Y*

14.41%

5Y*

15.95%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLOZX vs. FDFIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLOZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLOZX is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLOZX is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLOZX is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLOZX is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLOZX is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLOZX is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDFIX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MLOZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLOZX and FDFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than FDFIX's 1.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MLOZX
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.
5.95%10.24%4.61%3.66%3.81%6.57%5.21%4.44%3.86%3.72%6.05%3.17%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.27%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.28%, which is greater than FDFIX's maximum drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and FDFIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MLOZX vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) at 4.78%. This indicates that MLOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...