MLOZX vs. VOO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MLOZX (Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - MLOZX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Cohen & Steers, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MLOZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

MLOZX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MLOZX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VOO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 8.58%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 15.14%
• ALL TIME*: 14.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.82B	$3.78B	$5.44B

MLOZX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	32.43%	17.35%	12.16%	10.49%	21.10%	39.09%	-26.70%	12.62%	-13.43%	0.33%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.16%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and VOO is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between MLOZX and VOO has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLOZX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLOZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLOZX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLOZX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.44	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MLOZX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.38%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.67%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLOZX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.82%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.93%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.01%	—

MLOZX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLOZX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	1.45%	1.71%	10.24%	4.61%	3.66%	3.08%	6.57%	6.21%	4.44%	3.86%	3.72%	6.05%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLOZX and VOO in my portfolio?

MLOZX and VOO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.