MLOZX vs. VPU
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. VPU is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
MLOZX vs. VPU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. VPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 7.79% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly higher than VPU's 7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed VPU with an annualized return of 11.89%, while VPU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
VPU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VPU's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. VPU — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
VPU
MLOZX vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.25 | +1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 1.70 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.23 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.30 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 5.48 | +8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.25 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.62 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and VPU is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VPU's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 2.57% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than VPU's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and VPU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -46.31% | -25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -8.90% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -25.15% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -36.42% | -28.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -3.12% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -7.82% | -13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.74% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.54%, while Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.99% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 10.18% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 15.54% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 16.91% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 19.07% | +5.10% |