PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRE vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -32.77% return.


CSRE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.28%
6M
13.66%
YTD
15.74%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.47%

MSTZ

1D
-3.35%
1M
3.78%
6M
-35.30%
YTD
-32.77%
1Y
150.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-86.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.71M$3.33M$3.84M
$99.07M$124.74M$178.48M

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and MSTZ is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRE vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSRE
CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSREMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.78

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

3.30

+3.93

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSREMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-99.38%

+86.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-84.89%

+76.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-97.71%

+95.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-94.63%

+92.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

45.77%

-43.49%

Volatility

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is 3.75%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 33.58%. This indicates that CSRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSREMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

33.58%

-29.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

134.23%

-123.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

149.52%

-135.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

169.71%

-154.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

169.71%

-154.23%

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRE vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSRE and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (33.58%) compared to CSRE (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 150.38% vs 16.49% for CSRE. On fees, CSRE is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, CSRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 150.38% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSRE is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

CSRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

CSRE is categorized as REIT, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 1.05% for MSTZ.

CSRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRE and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer