CSRE vs. BLDG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSRE returned 12.27% vs 11.70% for BLDG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.

Performance

CSRE vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 9.06% return.

CSRE

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLDG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	11.91%	4.30%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	9.06%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and BLDG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.71

The correlation between CSRE and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSRE vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE

CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 28
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 27
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSRE	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.01	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.44	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	1.17	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	4.09	+0.59

CSRE vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and BLDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and BLDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSRE	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-27.25%	+14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-10.08%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-2.46%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-9.15%	+6.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.87%	-0.24%

Volatility

CSRE vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.59%. This indicates that CSRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSRE	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.59%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	9.03%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.62%	11.62%	+2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	15.28%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.61%	15.56%	+0.05%

CSRE vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSRE vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than BLDG's 5.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.39%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	2.25%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSRE and BLDG in my portfolio?

CSRE and BLDG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSRE or BLDG?

CSRE has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to BLDG (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs BLDG's -27.25%.

Which ETF is better, CSRE or BLDG?

On 1-year performance, CSRE leads with 12.27% vs 11.70% for BLDG. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSRE or BLDG?

Over the 1-year period, CSRE has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSRE or BLDG?

BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSRE or BLDG?

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 2.25% for CSRE.

What is the main difference between CSRE and BLDG?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.59% for BLDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.