MSTZ vs. MSTR
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) is Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX, while MSTR (Strategy Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, MSTZ returned 159.07% vs -74.56% for MSTR. Their -1.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -30.44% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -38.61% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 159.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
MSTR
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -37.69%
- YTD
- -38.61%
- 1Y
- -74.56%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTR Strategy Inc | $1.53B | $1.65B | $2.43B |
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M |
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | -38.61% | -47.53% | 120.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and MSTR is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between MSTZ and MSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
MSTR
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTZ | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.78 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | -0.97 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | -1.38 | +5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and MSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -99.86% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -79.53% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.63% | -80.31% | -17.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.63% | -86.42% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.62% | 55.64% | -10.02% |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.86% compared to Strategy Inc (MSTR) at 18.58%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.86% | 18.58% | +19.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 134.52% | 60.57% | +73.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.23% | 75.24% | +74.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.87% | 89.94% | +79.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.87% | 74.33% | +95.54% |
Dividends
MSTZ vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTZ nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and MSTR have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to MSTR (18.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.38% vs MSTR's -99.86%.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and MSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer