CSRE vs. CSNR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSRE is a REIT fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSRE returned 12.22% vs 31.06% for CSNR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.

Performance

CSRE vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than CSNR's 11.05% return.

CSRE

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 13.41%
• 6M: 13.96%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSNR

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -7.34%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 31.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	13.41%	4.30%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	11.05%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and CSNR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

CSRE vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE

CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 28
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 60
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSRE	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.75	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	2.32	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	3.07	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	12.10	-7.44

CSRE vs. CSNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the CSNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and CSNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum CSNR drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and CSNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSRE	CSNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-15.33%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-10.18%	+1.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-10.18%	+9.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-1.97%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.57%	+0.06%

Volatility

CSRE vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is 5.07%, while Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that CSRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSRE	CSNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	6.08%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.38%	14.51%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	17.87%	-4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	20.02%	-4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	20.02%	-4.39%

CSRE vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSRE vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than CSNR's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	2.17%	2.39%
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	2.22%	2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSRE and CSNR in my portfolio?

CSRE and CSNR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSRE or CSNR?

CSNR has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to CSRE (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs CSNR's -15.33%.

Which ETF is better, CSRE or CSNR?

On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 31.06% vs 12.22% for CSRE. On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CSRE has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSRE or CSNR?

Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 31.06% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSRE or CSNR?

CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSRE or CSNR?

CSRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 2.17% for CSNR.

What is the main difference between CSRE and CSNR?

CSRE is categorized as REIT, while CSNR is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.50% for CSNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.