PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -35.10% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -27.53% return.


MSTZ

1D
5.10%
1M
83.66%
YTD
-35.10%
6M
-24.64%
1Y
119.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
2.34%
1M
-15.24%
YTD
-27.53%
6M
-28.30%
1Y
-40.14%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTZ vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-35.10%-38.95%-94.43%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-27.53%-11.19%52.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and BITO is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.78

The correlation between MSTZ and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTZBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.86

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

-0.76

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

-1.29

+4.10

MSTZ vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTZ and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.38%

-77.86%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-53.10%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.79%

-50.02%

-47.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-36.85%

-57.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.73%

31.11%

+11.62%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 41.90% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.60%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.90%

12.60%

+29.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

127.30%

34.26%

+93.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.69%

44.05%

+99.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.83%

55.02%

+114.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.83%

55.02%

+114.81%

MSTZ vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
68.72%78.29%61.59%15.14%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and BITO have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (41.90%) compared to BITO (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.38% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 119.74% vs -40.14% for BITO. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 12.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 119.74% return vs -40.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 68.72%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

MSTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 0.95% for BITO.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer