CSRE vs. CSSD
CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSRE is a REIT fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSSD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.
Performance
CSRE vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than CSSD's 2.86% return.
CSRE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSRE vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF | 13.37% | -0.28% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.86% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSRE and CSSD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSRE vs. CSSD — Risk / Return Rank
CSRE
CSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSRE vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSRE vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and CSSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -2.32% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.06% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -0.29% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | — | — |
Volatility
CSRE vs. CSSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 3.07% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 3.07% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 3.07% | +12.53% |
CSRE vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSRE vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison
CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than CSSD's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF | 2.23% | 2.71% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.62% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSRE and CSSD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.23% for CSRE.
CSRE is categorized as REIT, while CSSD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.49% for CSSD.
Find the right allocation for CSRE and CSSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer