CSRE vs. CSSD
CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSRE is a REIT fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSSD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.
Performance
CSRE vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than CSSD's 2.56% return.
CSRE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSRE vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF | 9.87% | -0.32% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.56% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSRE and CSSD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSRE vs. CSSD — Risk / Return Rank
CSRE
CSSD
CSRE vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 2.09 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
CSRE vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and CSSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -2.32% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | 0.00% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -0.32% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | — | — |
Volatility
CSRE vs. CSSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSRE | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 3.18% | +9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 3.18% | +12.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 3.18% | +12.27% |
CSRE vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSRE vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison
CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than CSSD's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF | 2.30% | 2.71% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.63% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSRE and CSSD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.30% for CSRE.
CSRE is categorized as REIT, while CSSD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.49% for CSSD.
Find the right allocation for CSRE and CSSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer