PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-27.23%-38.95%-94.26%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-48.86%-89.07%197.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -27.23% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -48.86% return.


MSTZ

1D
-5.53%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-27.23%
6M
137.26%
1Y
-11.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
5.59%
1M
-13.09%
YTD
-48.86%
6M
-90.86%
1Y
-92.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSTZ vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTZ and MSTU have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTZMSTUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

-0.63

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

-1.49

+2.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.83

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.96

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.17

-1.43

+1.26

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTZ and MSTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTZMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.63

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

-0.40

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and MSTU is -1.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTZ nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and MSTU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-98.58%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.20%

-96.58%

+13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.45%

-98.34%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.91%

-69.01%

-24.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.32%

64.73%

-3.41%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) have volatilities of 38.43% and 37.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSTZMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.43%

37.12%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

122.48%

110.15%

+12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

147.15%

145.82%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

173.11%

171.76%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.11%

171.76%

+1.35%