PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRE vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRE vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than BBRE's 15.29% return.


CSRE

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
11.91%
6M
12.59%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBRE

1D
1.19%
1M
0.51%
YTD
15.29%
6M
15.60%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and BBRE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.91

The correlation between CSRE and BBRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRE vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE
CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSREBBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.18

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

6.84

-2.16

CSRE vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the BBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and BBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum BBRE drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and BBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSREBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-43.61%

+30.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-8.07%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.64%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-10.46%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.57%

+0.06%

Volatility

CSRE vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is 4.88%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that CSRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSREBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.15%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

10.23%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

13.99%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

18.81%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

22.54%

-6.93%

CSRE vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRE vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than BBRE's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.72%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%
CSRE
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF
2.25%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CSRE and BBRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBRE has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to CSRE (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs BBRE's -43.61%.

On 1-year performance, BBRE leads with 17.50% vs 12.27% for CSRE. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, CSRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 17.50% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.25% for CSRE.

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.11% for BBRE.

BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRE and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer