PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRE vs. CSPF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRE vs. CSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than CSPF's 2.65% return.


CSRE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.87%
6M
8.55%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSPF

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. CSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and CSPF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRE vs. CSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE
CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPF
CSPF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. CSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSRECSPFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.00

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

13.63

-9.46

CSRE vs. CSPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CSPF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and CSPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSRECSPFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.26

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.96

-1.31

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. CSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, which is greater than CSPF's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and CSPF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSRECSPFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-3.06%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-3.06%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-0.32%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-0.44%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.67%

+1.94%

Volatility

CSRE vs. CSPF - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) at 1.08%. This indicates that CSRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSRECSPFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.08%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

3.03%

+6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

4.07%

+8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

4.17%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

4.17%

+11.28%

CSRE vs. CSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRE vs. CSPF - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than CSPF's 5.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSRE and CSPF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSRE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to CSPF (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs CSPF's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, CSRE leads with 10.86% vs 9.14% for CSPF. On fees, CSPF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CSPF has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSRE has performed better with a 10.86% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSPF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

CSPF has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 2.30% for CSRE.

CSRE is categorized as REIT, while CSPF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.59% for CSPF.

CSPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRE and CSPF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer