CSSD vs. CSIO
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSD is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSIO is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSIO.
Performance
CSSD vs. CSIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSD achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than CSIO's 16.14% return.
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CSIO
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $451.91K | $286.82K | $407.68K | |
| $135.14K | $635.62K | $292.35K |
CSSD vs. CSIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.03% | 0.49% |
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 16.14% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and CSIO is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. CSIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. CSIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum CSIO drawdown of -5.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and CSIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -5.86% | +3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.55% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -1.08% | +0.80% |
Volatility
CSSD vs. CSIO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 11.16% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 11.16% | -8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 11.16% | -8.20% |
CSSD vs. CSIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. CSIO - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CSIO's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 1.46% | 0.00% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.63% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and CSIO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.46% for CSIO.
CSSD is categorized as Preferred Stock, while CSIO is Infrastructure Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.65% for CSIO.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and CSIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer