CSSD vs. EVPF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.

Performance

CSSD vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSSD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 1.93%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EVPF

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	$135.14K	$635.62K	$292.35K
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	$219.09K	$314.39K	$349.89K

CSSD vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	1.85%
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSD and EVPF is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026	0.63

Return for Risk

CSSD vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CSSD vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, roughly equal to the maximum EVPF drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and EVPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSSD	EVPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-2.36%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.74%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.45%	+0.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSSD	EVPF	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	3.77%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.96%	3.77%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.96%	3.77%	-0.81%

CSSD vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSSD vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison

CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than EVPF's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	3.63%	0.53%
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	2.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSSD and EVPF in my portfolio?

CSSD and EVPF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSSD or EVPF?

On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSSD or EVPF?

EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CSSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSSD or EVPF?

CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.10% for EVPF.

What is the main difference between CSSD and EVPF?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.39% for EVPF.