CSSD vs. CSNR
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSD is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.
Performance
CSSD vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSD achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than CSNR's 16.85% return.
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CSNR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 37.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $443.17K | $375.51K | $755.16K | |
| $135.14K | $635.62K | $292.35K |
CSSD vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.03% | 0.49% |
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 16.85% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and CSNR is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank
CSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSNR
CSSD vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSSD | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum CSNR drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and CSNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -15.33% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -5.49% | +5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -2.49% | +2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.93% | — |
Volatility
CSSD vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 17.87% | -14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 19.67% | -16.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 19.67% | -16.71% |
CSSD vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CSNR's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 1.88% | 2.39% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.63% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and CSNR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.88% for CSNR.
CSSD is categorized as Preferred Stock, while CSNR is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.50% for CSNR.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and CSNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer