CSSD vs. FCVT
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSD is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while FCVT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FCVT.
Performance
CSSD vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSD achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 14.79% return.
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FCVT
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $135.14K | $635.62K | $292.35K | |
| $3.38M | $2.19M | $1.42M |
CSSD vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.03% | 0.49% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 14.79% | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and FCVT is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank
CSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCVT
CSSD vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSSD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and FCVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -31.79% | +29.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -10.08% | +9.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -10.29% | +10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility
CSSD vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 19.11% | -16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 14.76% | -11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 14.99% | -12.03% |
CSSD vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FCVT's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.63% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 1.14% | 1.98% | 1.30% | 1.76% | 3.71% | 23.07% | 1.72% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.18% | 1.88% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and FCVT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.14% for FCVT.
CSSD is categorized as Preferred Stock, while FCVT is Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.95% for FCVT.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and FCVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer