CRWG vs. HDV
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. CRWG is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
CRWG vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 68.19% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 12.41% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- 4.37%
- 1M
- 12.52%
- YTD
- 68.19%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
CRWG vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 68.19% | -81.81% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.41% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and HDV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDV
CRWG vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -37.04% | -52.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.87% | -2.79% | -72.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.77% | -3.08% | -65.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.51% | 9.86% | +179.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.51% | 12.81% | +176.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.51% | 15.74% | +173.77% |
CRWG vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than HDV's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 4.40% | 7.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and HDV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.94% for HDV.
CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.08% for HDV.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer