CRWG vs. LABU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWG is actively managed, while LABU is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for LABU.

Performance

CRWG vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 53.84% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 3.80% return.

CRWG

• 1D: -14.04%
• 1M: -28.24%
• YTD: 53.84%
• 6M: 13.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LABU

• 1D: 4.61%
• 1M: -11.09%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 195.85%
• 3Y*: 7.82%
• 5Y*: -32.76%
• 10Y*: -13.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	53.84%	-83.24%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	3.80%	167.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and LABU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

CRWG vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 75
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWG	LABU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.24	-0.19

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and LABU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWG	LABU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.42%	-99.18%	+9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.70%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-78.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.02%	-96.34%	+19.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.53%	-81.68%	+13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWG	LABU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	59.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.73%	75.91%	+115.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	191.73%	95.58%	+96.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.73%	95.42%	+96.31%

CRWG vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWG vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than LABU's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	4.81%	7.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.74%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWG and LABU in my portfolio?

CRWG and LABU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRWG or LABU?

On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWG or LABU?

CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWG or LABU?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.74% for LABU.

What is the main difference between CRWG and LABU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.12% for LABU.