PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWG vs. SPYQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 34.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPYQ's 11.91% return.


CRWG

1D
-9.65%
1M
-6.23%
YTD
34.43%
6M
5.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYQ

1D
-2.39%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
11.91%
6M
9.83%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
34.43%-81.81%
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
11.91%12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and SPYQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWG vs. SPYQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPYQ
SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRWGSPYQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than SPYQ's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and SPYQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWGSPYQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.42%

-35.88%

-53.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.92%

-5.82%

-74.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-4.86%

-64.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

Volatility

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWGSPYQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

189.35%

24.72%

+164.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

189.35%

34.60%

+154.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

189.35%

34.60%

+154.75%

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYQ's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWG vs. SPYQ - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than SPYQ's 0.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWG and SPYQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 0.15% for SPYQ.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.30% for SPYQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWG and SPYQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer