CRWG vs. BABX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BABX.

Performance

CRWG vs. BABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly higher than BABX's -48.20% return.

CRWG

• 1D: -8.24%
• 1M: -41.80%
• 6M: -50.15%
• YTD: -27.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -3.31%
• 6M: -59.30%
• YTD: -48.20%
• 1Y: -16.91%
• 3Y*: -8.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	-27.71%	-81.81%
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-48.20%	31.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and BABX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

CRWG vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BABX

BABX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWG	BABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.39	—

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than BABX's maximum drawdown of -78.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and BABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWG	BABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.42%	-78.83%	-10.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-78.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-78.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.20%	-70.76%	-18.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.89%	-46.05%	-23.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	43.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWG	BABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	26.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	60.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	188.44%	90.15%	+98.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	188.44%	83.34%	+105.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	188.44%	83.34%	+105.10%

CRWG vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWG vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, while BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	10.23%	7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWG and BABX in my portfolio?

CRWG and BABX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRWG or BABX?

On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWG or BABX?

CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWG or BABX?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 10.23%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.

What is the main difference between CRWG and BABX?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.15% for BABX.