PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWG vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 46.05% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.


CRWG

1D
-5.06%
1M
-34.22%
YTD
46.05%
6M
-7.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-15.62%
1M
119.20%
YTD
774.91%
6M
1,229.17%
1Y
5,016.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
46.05%-83.24%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
774.91%331.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and MULL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWG

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWG vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWGMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

6.53

-6.96

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWGMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.42%

-72.29%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.18%

-15.62%

-62.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

-20.61%

-47.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.82%

Volatility

CRWG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWGMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

57.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.34%

133.41%

+57.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.34%

136.72%

+54.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.34%

136.72%

+54.62%

CRWG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWG and MULL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.50% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWG and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer