CRWG vs. MULL
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
CRWG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 46.05% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- 46.05%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -15.62%
- 1M
- 119.20%
- YTD
- 774.91%
- 6M
- 1,229.17%
- 1Y
- 5,016.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 46.05% | -83.24% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 774.91% | 331.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and MULL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
MULL
CRWG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 6.53 | -6.96 |
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -72.29% | -17.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.18% | -15.62% | -62.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -20.61% | -47.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 57.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.34% | 133.41% | +57.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 136.72% | +54.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 136.72% | +54.62% |
CRWG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 5.06% | 7.39% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and MULL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer