CRWG vs. SOXS
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). CRWG is actively managed, while SOXS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
CRWG vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 46.05% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.63% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- 46.05%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -54.82%
- YTD
- -91.63%
- 6M
- -91.49%
- 1Y
- -97.52%
- 3Y*
- -86.60%
- 5Y*
- -79.43%
- 10Y*
- -78.82%
CRWG vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 46.05% | -83.24% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.63% | -57.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and SOXS is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
SOXS
CRWG vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWG | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.79 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -100.00% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.18% | -100.00% | +21.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -92.61% | +24.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 68.11% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 44.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 84.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.34% | 102.19% | +89.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 108.21% | +83.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 100.48% | +90.86% |
CRWG vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than SOXS's 64.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 5.06% | 7.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.53% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and SOXS have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.53%, compared with 5.06% for CRWG.
CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 1.08% for SOXS.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer