CQP vs. WES
CQP (Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.) and WES (Western Midstream Partners, LP) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, CQP returned 14.69%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for WES. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CQP vs. WES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 21.40% return, which is significantly higher than WES's 17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed WES with an annualized return of 14.69%, while WES has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.
CQP
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- 1Y
- 15.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
WES
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 6M
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 30.48%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
CQP vs. WES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 21.40% | 6.80% | 12.59% | -5.09% | 44.79% | 27.83% | -4.97% | 16.60% | 30.13% | 8.91% |
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 17.89% | 12.77% | 43.58% | 19.46% | 29.29% | 72.31% | -19.13% | -22.65% | -20.23% | -8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and WES is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012 | 0.46 |
The correlation between CQP and WES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CQP:
$30.58B
WES:
$17.85B
CQP:
$5.21
WES:
$3.09
CQP:
12.13
WES:
14.43
CQP:
0.38
WES:
1.07
CQP:
2.69
WES:
4.31
CQP:
392.10
WES:
5.09
CQP:
$11.37B
WES:
$4.05B
CQP:
$3.20B
WES:
$2.79B
CQP:
$3.96B
WES:
$2.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQP vs. WES — Risk / Return Rank
CQP
WES
CQP vs. WES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQP | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 2.77 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 6.16 | -3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQP vs. WES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, smaller than the maximum WES drawdown of -93.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and WES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQP | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -93.66% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -9.42% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -16.65% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -23.54% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.31% | -91.90% | +31.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.77% | -5.83% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -28.49% | +13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 4.23% | +2.18% |
Volatility
CQP vs. WES - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) at 7.47%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQP | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.30% | 7.47% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | 15.58% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 20.24% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.44% | 29.20% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.14% | 46.62% | -14.48% |
Dividends
CQP vs. WES - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than WES's 8.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 5.17% | 6.15% | 5.06% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% |
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 8.21% | 9.13% | 8.33% | 8.52% | 6.80% | 5.69% | 11.25% | 12.45% | 8.28% | 5.43% | 4.03% | 3.86% |
Financials
CQP vs. WES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Western Midstream Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CQP vs. WES - Profitability Comparison
CQP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 859.34M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.5%.
CQP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 361.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
WES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 469.19M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.8%.
CQP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 186.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
WES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 350.28M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CQP and WES have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CQP has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to WES (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQP dropped -78.70% vs WES's -93.66%.
WES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CQP and WES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer