PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CQP vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CQPLNG
YTD Return1.09%-7.54%
1Y Return10.17%5.90%
3Y Return (Ann)13.68%24.51%
5Y Return (Ann)9.88%19.01%
10Y Return (Ann)10.84%10.85%
Sharpe Ratio0.510.34
Daily Std Dev27.40%21.43%
Max Drawdown-78.49%-98.89%
Current Drawdown-18.47%-13.34%

Fundamentals


CQPLNG
Market Cap$23.04B$35.96B
EPS$4.63$20.75
PE Ratio10.287.57
PEG Ratio6.160.60
Revenue (TTM)$9.04B$16.76B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.11B$5.98B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.46B$9.86B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CQP and LNG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CQP vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's -7.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CQP having a 10.84% annualized return and LNG not far ahead at 10.85%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
837.07%
401.68%
CQP
LNG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CQP vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CQP, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CQP, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CQP, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CQP, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CQP, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.19
LNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.91

CQP vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CQP and LNG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.51
0.34
CQP
LNG

Dividends

CQP vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than LNG's 1.08% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
8.04%8.36%6.82%6.30%7.28%6.06%6.04%5.76%5.87%6.49%5.28%5.90%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
1.08%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CQP vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.49%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-18.47%
-13.34%
CQP
LNG

Volatility

CQP vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 6.20%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.23%
6.20%
CQP
LNG

Financials

CQP vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items