CQP vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CQP or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and ET is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CQP vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CQP:
0.76
ET:
0.82
CQP:
1.16
ET:
1.11
CQP:
1.15
ET:
1.15
CQP:
1.12
ET:
0.79
CQP:
3.14
ET:
2.48
CQP:
7.42%
ET:
7.80%
CQP:
32.05%
ET:
27.60%
CQP:
-78.46%
ET:
-87.81%
CQP:
-14.63%
ET:
-12.15%
Fundamentals
CQP:
$27.64B
ET:
$60.95B
CQP:
$4.15
ET:
$1.32
CQP:
13.76
ET:
13.45
CQP:
6.16
ET:
0.84
CQP:
2.94
ET:
0.74
CQP:
36.24
ET:
1.76
CQP:
$9.40B
ET:
$82.06B
CQP:
$4.41B
ET:
$15.84B
CQP:
$2.12B
ET:
$15.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -5.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 12.84%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.
CQP
10.81%
-1.37%
9.12%
24.31%
10.93%
19.96%
12.84%
ET
-5.46%
7.33%
-2.37%
22.37%
26.92%
27.41%
1.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CQP vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CQP
ET
CQP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CQP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than ET's 7.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 5.69% | 6.52% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% | 5.31% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.25% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
CQP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) is 9.32%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that CQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CQP vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CQP vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
CQP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
CQP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 826.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
CQP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 641.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.