CQP vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CQP or ET.
Key characteristics
| CQP | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.18% | 19.63% |
| 1Y Return | 10.31% | 38.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.58% | 24.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.00% | 11.25% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.90% | 3.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.32 | 2.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.24% | 14.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.49% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.21% | -3.76% |
Fundamentals
| CQP | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.04B | $53.72B |
| EPS | $4.63 | $1.09 |
| PE Ratio | 10.28 | 14.62 |
| PEG Ratio | 6.16 | 0.58 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.04B | $81.22B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.11B | $13.42B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.46B | $13.05B |
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and ET is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CQP vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 10.90%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CQP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CQP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than ET's 7.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 8.12% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.06% | 6.04% | 5.76% | 5.87% | 6.49% | 5.28% | 5.90% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.93% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.49%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CQP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 9.40% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.24%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CQP vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities