CQP vs. WMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CQP or WMB.
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and WMB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CQP vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CQP:
0.24
WMB:
3.15
CQP:
0.50
WMB:
3.98
CQP:
1.06
WMB:
1.52
CQP:
0.24
WMB:
5.05
CQP:
0.75
WMB:
18.64
CQP:
7.54%
WMB:
3.30%
CQP:
23.71%
WMB:
19.55%
CQP:
-78.46%
WMB:
-98.04%
CQP:
-9.53%
WMB:
-8.74%
Fundamentals
CQP:
$26.50B
WMB:
$65.45B
CQP:
$4.63
WMB:
$2.36
CQP:
11.83
WMB:
22.75
CQP:
6.16
WMB:
8.92
CQP:
$8.93B
WMB:
$10.68B
CQP:
$4.72B
WMB:
$6.07B
CQP:
$4.28B
WMB:
$7.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 62.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed WMB with an annualized return of 13.02%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.
CQP
14.63%
-2.53%
13.36%
9.65%
13.43%
13.02%
WMB
62.14%
-8.60%
27.81%
60.71%
25.01%
7.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CQP vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CQP vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than WMB's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 6.51% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% | 5.31% | 5.93% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 3.52% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% | 4.36% | 3.73% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and WMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CQP vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 7.47%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CQP vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities