CQP vs. WMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
Performance
CQP vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CQP vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 22.61% | 6.80% | 12.59% | -5.09% | 44.79% | 27.83% | -4.97% | 16.60% | 30.13% | 8.91% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.95% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
Fundamentals
CQP:
$31.28B
WMB:
$88.94B
CQP:
$6.15
WMB:
$2.14
CQP:
10.51
WMB:
33.97
CQP:
0.33
WMB:
1.76
CQP:
2.91
WMB:
7.45
CQP:
9.91
WMB:
6.96
CQP:
$10.76B
WMB:
$11.94B
CQP:
$4.31B
WMB:
$6.83B
CQP:
$4.42B
WMB:
$7.41B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CQP having a 22.61% return and WMB slightly lower at 21.95%. Over the past 10 years, CQP has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 16.02%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 23.08% annualized return.
CQP
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 22.61%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
WMB
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 40.30%
- 5Y*
- 31.00%
- 10Y*
- 23.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQP vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank
CQP
WMB
CQP vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CQP | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 1.05 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.44 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.18 | -1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 4.69 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQP | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 1.05 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.33 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.23 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and WMB is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CQP vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than WMB's 2.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 5.11% | 6.15% | 5.06% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.78% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and WMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQP | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.46% | -98.03% | +19.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.58% | -12.36% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -23.01% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.31% | -68.08% | +7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -3.88% | -3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -27.17% | +12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | 5.75% | +10.00% |
Volatility
CQP vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 5.10%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CQP | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 5.10% | +7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 16.36% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 24.70% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 23.40% | +8.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 31.62% | +0.55% |
Financials
CQP vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CQP vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison
CQP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.
CQP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.9%.
CQP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 734.00M and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in a net margin of 23.0%.