CQP vs. MPLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and MPLX LP (MPLX).

Performance

CQP vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CQP vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	22.61%	6.80%	12.59%	-5.09%	44.79%	27.83%	-4.97%	16.60%	30.13%	8.91%
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	53.92%	-1.79%	-8.25%	-8.43%	9.00%

Fundamentals

EPS CQP : $6.15 MPLX : $7.24
PE Ratio CQP : 10.51 MPLX : 7.88
PEG Ratio CQP : 0.33 MPLX : 0.14
PS Ratio CQP : 2.91 MPLX : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) CQP : $10.76B MPLX : $13.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) CQP : $4.31B MPLX : $4.69B
EBITDA (TTM) CQP : $4.42B MPLX : $6.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 22.61% return, which is significantly higher than MPLX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has underperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 16.02%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.

CQP

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 22.61%
• 6M: 23.85%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 16.02%

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CQP vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQP

CQP Risk / Return Rank: 45
CQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CQP Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CQP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQP vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CQP	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	0.82	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.19	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.16	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	1.07	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.47	3.80	-3.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CQP vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQP and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQP	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	0.82	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	1.44	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.56	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.39	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CQP and MPLX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CQP vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than MPLX's 7.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	5.11%	6.15%	5.06%	8.36%	6.82%	6.30%	7.28%	6.08%	6.07%	5.79%	5.90%	6.52%
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%

Drawdowns

CQP vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and MPLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQP	MPLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.46%	-85.72%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.58%	-13.38%	-10.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.12%	-18.46%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.31%	-75.21%	+14.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-3.55%	-4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.69%	-30.33%	+15.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.75%	3.75%	+12.00%

Volatility

CQP vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 3.97%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQP	MPLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.49%	3.97%	+8.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.04%	11.15%	+7.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.56%	18.89%	+11.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.29%	19.54%	+12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.17%	30.91%	+1.26%

Financials

CQP vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CQP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CQP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

CQP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.