CQP vs. MPLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and MPLX LP (MPLX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CQP or MPLX.
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and MPLX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CQP vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CQP:
0.24
MPLX:
3.06
CQP:
0.50
MPLX:
4.24
CQP:
1.06
MPLX:
1.53
CQP:
0.24
MPLX:
4.03
CQP:
0.75
MPLX:
17.85
CQP:
7.54%
MPLX:
2.41%
CQP:
23.71%
MPLX:
14.12%
CQP:
-78.46%
MPLX:
-85.72%
CQP:
-9.53%
MPLX:
-7.24%
Fundamentals
CQP:
$26.50B
MPLX:
$48.60B
CQP:
$4.63
MPLX:
$4.24
CQP:
11.83
MPLX:
11.25
CQP:
6.16
MPLX:
2.27
CQP:
$8.93B
MPLX:
$10.91B
CQP:
$4.72B
MPLX:
$4.95B
CQP:
$4.28B
MPLX:
$6.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 41.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 13.02%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.30% annualized return.
CQP
14.63%
-2.53%
13.36%
9.65%
13.43%
13.02%
MPLX
41.90%
-3.19%
18.10%
42.67%
25.74%
5.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CQP vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CQP vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than MPLX's 7.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 6.51% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% | 5.31% | 5.93% |
MPLX MPLX LP | 7.32% | 8.65% | 8.80% | 11.30% | 12.71% | 10.42% | 8.22% | 6.23% | 5.86% | 4.33% | 1.83% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and MPLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CQP vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 7.31%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CQP vs. MPLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and MPLX LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities