PortfoliosLab logo
WES vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WES and ET is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WES vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WES:

0.58

ET:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

WES:

0.89

ET:

1.22

Omega Ratio

WES:

1.11

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

WES:

0.88

ET:

0.89

Martin Ratio

WES:

2.28

ET:

2.83

Ulcer Index

WES:

6.39%

ET:

7.70%

Daily Std Dev

WES:

27.28%

ET:

27.56%

Max Drawdown

WES:

-93.66%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

WES:

-3.21%

ET:

-11.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WES:

$15.08B

ET:

$61.67B

EPS

WES:

$3.34

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

WES:

11.84

ET:

13.61

PEG Ratio

WES:

5.48

ET:

0.80

PS Ratio

WES:

4.15

ET:

0.75

PB Ratio

WES:

4.72

ET:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

WES:

$3.63B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WES:

$2.52B

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

WES:

$2.11B

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WES achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WES has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 2.93%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.92% annualized return.


WES

YTD

8.03%

1M

8.67%

6M

8.68%

1Y

15.81%

5Y*

53.06%

10Y*

2.93%

ET

YTD

-5.09%

1M

8.13%

6M

7.53%

1Y

22.07%

5Y*

30.96%

10Y*

1.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WES vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WES is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WES is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WES is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WES is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WES is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WES is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WES vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WES Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WES and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WES vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

WES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than ET's 7.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WES
Western Midstream Partners, LP
8.92%8.33%8.52%6.80%5.69%11.25%12.45%8.28%5.44%4.04%3.86%1.73%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.21%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

WES vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WES drawdown since its inception was -93.66%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WES and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WES vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is 8.42%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 11.55%. This indicates that WES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WES vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Western Midstream Partners, LP and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
917.12M
21.02B
(WES) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WES vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Western Midstream Partners, LP and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
76.9%
19.4%
(WES) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
WES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 705.16M and revenue of 917.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

WES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 409.80M and revenue of 917.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.7%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

WES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 309.01M and revenue of 917.12M, resulting in a net margin of 33.7%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.