WES vs. ET
WES (Western Midstream Partners, LP) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, WES returned 8.66%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ET. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
WES vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WES achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, WES has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 8.66%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.
WES
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 6M
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 25.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
ET
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
WES vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 15.38% | 12.77% | 43.58% | 19.46% | 29.29% | 72.31% | -19.13% | -22.65% | -20.23% | -8.01% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 22.80% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between WES and ET is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012 | 0.53 |
The correlation between WES and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WES:
$17.47B
ET:
$67.56B
WES:
$3.09
ET:
$1.36
WES:
14.12
ET:
14.36
WES:
4.22
ET:
0.78
WES:
4.98
ET:
1.36
WES:
$4.05B
ET:
$89.38B
WES:
$2.79B
ET:
$20.48B
WES:
$2.16B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WES vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
WES
ET
WES vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WES | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.91 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.04 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 4.50 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WES | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.91 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.36 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.36 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
WES vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WES drawdown since its inception was -93.66%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WES and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WES | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.66% | -87.81% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -10.02% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.65% | -24.56% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | -25.82% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.90% | -72.82% | -19.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.84% | -4.17% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -25.75% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 4.54% | -0.48% |
Volatility
WES vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 6.02%. This indicates that WES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WES | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 6.02% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 11.90% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 16.42% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.22% | 24.90% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.64% | 35.05% | +11.59% |
Dividends
WES vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
WES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than ET's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.83% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 8.39% | 9.13% | 8.33% | 8.52% | 6.80% | 5.69% | 11.25% | 12.45% | 8.28% | 5.43% | 4.03% | 3.86% |
Financials
WES vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Western Midstream Partners, LP and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WES vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
WES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 859.34M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.5%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
WES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 469.19M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.8%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
WES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 350.28M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WES and ET have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WES has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to ET (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WES dropped -93.66% vs ET's -87.81%.
WES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WES and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer