CQP vs. EPD
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD).
Performance
CQP vs. EPD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CQP vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 22.61% | 6.80% | 12.59% | -5.09% | 44.79% | 27.83% | -4.97% | 16.60% | 30.13% | 8.91% |
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 19.96% | 9.45% | 28.00% | 17.71% | 18.32% | 21.40% | -23.61% | 21.88% | -1.32% | 4.24% |
Fundamentals
CQP:
$31.28B
EPD:
$82.68B
CQP:
$6.15
EPD:
$2.65
CQP:
10.51
EPD:
14.27
CQP:
0.33
EPD:
2.29
CQP:
2.91
EPD:
1.57
CQP:
9.91
EPD:
2.75
CQP:
$10.76B
EPD:
$52.60B
CQP:
$4.31B
EPD:
$7.17B
CQP:
$4.42B
EPD:
$9.92B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 22.61% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed EPD with an annualized return of 16.02%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
CQP
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 22.61%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
EPD
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQP vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank
CQP
EPD
CQP vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CQP | EPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 1.00 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.40 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 1.23 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 3.48 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQP | EPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 1.00 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.15 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.54 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between CQP and EPD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CQP vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison
CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than EPD's 5.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 5.11% | 6.15% | 5.06% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% |
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 5.75% | 6.74% | 6.63% | 7.51% | 7.79% | 8.20% | 9.09% | 6.23% | 6.97% | 6.29% | 5.88% | 5.90% |
Drawdowns
CQP vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and EPD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQP | EPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.46% | -58.78% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.58% | -15.40% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -18.06% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.31% | -58.04% | -2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -3.67% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -10.17% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | 5.44% | +10.31% |
Volatility
CQP vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 5.70%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CQP | EPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 5.70% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 11.89% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 18.77% | +11.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 17.08% | +15.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 24.26% | +7.91% |
Financials
CQP vs. EPD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CQP vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison
CQP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
EPD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 13.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
CQP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.
EPD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.94B and revenue of 13.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
CQP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.
EPD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 13.79B, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.