CQP vs. EPD

In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed EPD with an annualized return of 13.33%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQP and EPD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than EPD's 6.73% yield.

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and EPD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 11.85%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.