COCO vs. CLS
COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. COCO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 3 years, COCO returned 42.88%/yr vs 183.16%/yr for CLS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COCO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COCO achieves a 34.69% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 21.73% return.
COCO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- 6M
- 29.89%
- YTD
- 34.69%
- 1Y
- 92.66%
- 3Y*
- 42.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -6.74%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- YTD
- 21.73%
- 1Y
- 123.47%
- 3Y*
- 183.16%
- 5Y*
- 115.63%
- 10Y*
- 44.01%
COCO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 34.69% | 43.62% | 43.90% | 85.60% | 23.72% | -27.33% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 21.73% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between COCO and CLS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
COCO:
$4.08B
CLS:
$41.37B
COCO:
$1.38
CLS:
$8.29
COCO:
51.88
CLS:
43.43
COCO:
0.43
CLS:
0.58
COCO:
6.53
CLS:
3.02
COCO:
12.26
CLS:
19.84
COCO:
$658.62M
CLS:
$13.81B
COCO:
$246.32M
CLS:
$1.60B
COCO:
$100.45M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COCO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
COCO
CLS
COCO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COCO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 4.35 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 9.37 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COCO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COCO drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COCO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COCO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.97% | -96.93% | +39.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -29.24% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.55% | -53.96% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.02% | -23.83% | +8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -73.19% | +56.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.02% | 13.56% | -4.54% |
Volatility
COCO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 18.95% and 18.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COCO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.95% | 18.67% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.60% | 54.75% | -10.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.47% | 73.61% | -19.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.89% | 58.07% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.89% | 50.17% | +6.72% |
Dividends
COCO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither COCO nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
COCO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COCO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
COCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
COCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
COCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COCO and CLS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COCO has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to CLS (18.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COCO dropped -56.97% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COCO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer