COCO vs. LOW
COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.) and LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. COCO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while LOW operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, COCO returned 35.70%/yr vs -1.71%/yr for LOW. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
COCO vs. LOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COCO achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly higher than LOW's -12.49% return.
COCO
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- YTD
- 24.39%
- 1Y
- 89.70%
- 3Y*
- 35.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 35.66%
LOW
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -8.09%
- 6M
- -21.33%
- YTD
- -12.49%
- 1Y
- -6.33%
- 3Y*
- -1.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.25M | $85.05M | $87.09M | |
| $697.98M | $655.53M | $672.08M |
COCO vs. LOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 24.39% | 43.62% | 43.90% | 85.60% | 23.72% | -27.33% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -12.49% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 14.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between COCO and LOW is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between COCO and LOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COCO:
$3.77B
LOW:
$116.57B
COCO:
$1.82
LOW:
$11.86
COCO:
36.31
LOW:
17.52
COCO:
0.30
LOW:
19.14
COCO:
5.63
LOW:
1.32
COCO:
$706.02M
LOW:
$88.43B
COCO:
$289.23M
LOW:
$29.89B
COCO:
$143.38M
LOW:
$11.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COCO vs. LOW — Risk / Return Rank
COCO
LOW
COCO vs. LOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COCO | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.99 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | -0.18 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | -0.34 | +10.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COCO vs. LOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COCO drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum LOW drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COCO and LOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COCO | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.97% | -62.52% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -28.97% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.55% | -28.97% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.52% | -26.89% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -16.63% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.02% | 15.23% | -6.21% |
Volatility
COCO vs. LOW - Volatility Comparison
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) at 9.51%. This indicates that COCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COCO | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | 9.51% | +4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.30% | 21.44% | +23.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.50% | 27.38% | +28.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.79% | 26.63% | +30.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.79% | 29.34% | +27.45% |
Dividends
COCO vs. LOW - Dividend Comparison
COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.33% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
Financials
COCO vs. LOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Lowe's Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COCO vs. LOW - Profitability Comparison
COCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.31M and revenue of 216.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.
LOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
COCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.14M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.
LOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
COCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 49.45M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.
LOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COCO and LOW have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COCO has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to LOW (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COCO dropped -56.97% vs LOW's -62.52%.
COCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COCO and LOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer