COCO vs. QQQ
COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, COCO returned 43.14%/yr vs 27.47%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COCO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COCO achieves a 56.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.41% return.
COCO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 56.35%
- 6M
- 55.24%
- 1Y
- 135.99%
- 3Y*
- 43.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
COCO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 56.35% | 43.62% | 43.90% | 85.60% | 23.72% | -27.33% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 6.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between COCO and QQQ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between COCO and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COCO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
COCO
QQQ
COCO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COCO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | 3.44 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 12.79 | +3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COCO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COCO drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COCO and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COCO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.97% | -82.97% | +26.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -11.96% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.55% | -22.77% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.99% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -32.73% | +15.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | 3.21% | +5.07% |
Volatility
COCO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that COCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COCO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 8.47% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 14.20% | +27.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.27% | 17.67% | +34.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.69% | 22.64% | +34.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.69% | 22.43% | +34.26% |
Dividends
COCO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COCO and QQQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COCO has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COCO dropped -56.97% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
COCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COCO and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer