PortfoliosLab logo
CNXT vs. CHIQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and CHIQ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CNXT vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.66%
75.95%
CNXT
CHIQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNXT:

0.22

CHIQ:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

CNXT:

0.70

CHIQ:

0.80

Omega Ratio

CNXT:

1.11

CHIQ:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CNXT:

0.15

CHIQ:

0.23

Martin Ratio

CNXT:

0.34

CHIQ:

0.91

Ulcer Index

CNXT:

28.94%

CHIQ:

15.75%

Daily Std Dev

CNXT:

54.58%

CHIQ:

39.47%

Max Drawdown

CNXT:

-68.98%

CHIQ:

-67.04%

Current Drawdown

CNXT:

-55.16%

CHIQ:

-47.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than CHIQ's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of -5.47%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.01% annualized return.


CNXT

YTD

-2.52%

1M

18.14%

6M

-16.77%

1Y

11.93%

5Y*

-1.69%

10Y*

-5.47%

CHIQ

YTD

13.38%

1M

18.83%

6M

0.66%

1Y

17.24%

5Y*

4.66%

10Y*

5.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNXT vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CNXT and CHIQ have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNXT vs. CHIQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNXT is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNXT is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNXT is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNXT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNXT is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNXT is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHIQ is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNXT vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the CHIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and CHIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.200.400.600.801.001.20December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.22
0.44
CNXT
CHIQ

Dividends

CNXT vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than CHIQ's 2.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.15%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.23%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
2.34%2.66%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.04%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%2.08%

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CHIQ drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and CHIQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-55.16%
-47.68%
CNXT
CHIQ

Volatility

CNXT vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is 8.81%, while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that CNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.81%
10.58%
CNXT
CHIQ