CHIQ vs. PGJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ).
CHIQ and PGJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIQ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009. PGJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Halter USX China Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2004. Both CHIQ and PGJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHIQ or PGJ.
Key characteristics
| CHIQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.11% | 11.54% |
| 1Y Return | 19.85% | 12.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.49% | -11.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.92% | -5.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.38% | 0.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.08 | 0.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.31 | 0.17 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.76 | 1.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.48% | 12.03% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.04% | 33.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.04% | -78.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.12% | -64.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and PGJ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than PGJ's 11.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has outperformed PGJ with an annualized return of 6.38%, while PGJ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.28% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than PGJ's 5.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 2.33% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% | 2.08% | 0.94% |
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 5.65% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% | 0.89% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum PGJ drawdown of -78.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and PGJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHIQ vs. PGJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) at 12.41%. This indicates that CHIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.