CHIQ vs. KURE
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE).
CHIQ and KURE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIQ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. Both CHIQ and KURE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHIQ or KURE.
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and KURE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CHIQ vs. KURE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CHIQ:
0.58
KURE:
0.34
CHIQ:
1.10
KURE:
0.74
CHIQ:
1.14
KURE:
1.10
CHIQ:
0.37
KURE:
0.18
CHIQ:
1.51
KURE:
0.61
CHIQ:
15.51%
KURE:
20.08%
CHIQ:
40.05%
KURE:
36.23%
CHIQ:
-67.04%
KURE:
-68.53%
CHIQ:
-49.60%
KURE:
-61.76%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CHIQ having a 9.22% return and KURE slightly higher at 9.65%.
CHIQ
9.22%
-7.37%
2.32%
20.07%
5.55%
4.39%
KURE
9.65%
3.87%
1.21%
10.95%
-7.31%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIQ vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CHIQ and KURE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHIQ vs. KURE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CHIQ
KURE
CHIQ vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than KURE's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 2.43% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% | 2.08% |
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 1.18% | 1.30% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, roughly equal to the maximum KURE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and KURE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHIQ vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a higher volatility of 16.61% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) at 14.99%. This indicates that CHIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.