PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIQ vs. CQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -20.10% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 6.31%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.


CHIQ

1D
-2.91%
1M
-10.77%
YTD
-20.10%
6M
-19.40%
1Y
-19.02%
3Y*
-2.37%
5Y*
-11.62%
10Y*
6.31%

CQQQ

1D
1.72%
1M
2.83%
YTD
3.27%
6M
7.18%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
-7.33%
10Y*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-20.10%13.69%10.74%-10.70%-22.01%-27.07%92.61%44.19%-28.65%67.74%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
3.27%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and CQQQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009

0.84

The correlation between CHIQ and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHIQ
CQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

96.1%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Technology

0.3%
57.4%

Industrials

0.2%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

22.9%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

CHIQ
96.1%
CQQQ
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

CHIQ
3.2%
CQQQ

-

Real Estate

CHIQ
0.4%
CQQQ

-

Technology

CHIQ
0.3%
CQQQ
57.4%

Industrials

CHIQ
0.2%
CQQQ
1.2%

Basic Materials

CHIQ

-

CQQQ
0.1%

Communication Services

CHIQ

-

CQQQ
22.9%

Energy

CHIQ

-

CQQQ

-

Financial Services

CHIQ

-

CQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

CHIQ

-

CQQQ

-

Utilities

CHIQ

-

CQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIQ
CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHIQCQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.18

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

1.16

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

2.66

-4.10

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and CQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIQCQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-73.99%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.32%

-24.41%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.32%

-35.93%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.95%

-66.96%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.04%

-73.99%

+6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.08%

-48.78%

-9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.66%

-28.34%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.24%

10.65%

+2.59%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.49%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHIQCQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

10.40%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.11%

23.03%

-6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

30.48%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.72%

38.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.44%

33.37%

-0.93%

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHIQ vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than CQQQ's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.85%1.48%2.65%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.05%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.10%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHIQ and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CQQQ has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to CHIQ (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.31% vs 5.81% for CQQQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.85% for CHIQ.

CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHIQ and CQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer