WRB vs. BCC
Compare and contrast key facts about W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WRB or BCC.
Correlation
The correlation between WRB and BCC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WRB vs. BCC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WRB:
1.33
BCC:
0.12
WRB:
1.80
BCC:
0.45
WRB:
1.26
BCC:
1.05
WRB:
2.19
BCC:
0.18
WRB:
4.76
BCC:
0.42
WRB:
6.14%
BCC:
10.67%
WRB:
21.95%
BCC:
38.04%
WRB:
-69.20%
BCC:
-67.67%
WRB:
-9.41%
BCC:
-19.22%
Fundamentals
WRB:
$22.43B
BCC:
$5.11B
WRB:
$3.90
BCC:
$10.21
WRB:
15.09
BCC:
13.04
WRB:
2.45
BCC:
1.09
WRB:
$13.17B
BCC:
$6.80B
WRB:
$9.54B
BCC:
$1.30B
WRB:
$2.08B
BCC:
$686.62M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a 26.65% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's -0.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WRB having a 16.92% annualized return and BCC not far ahead at 17.73%.
WRB
26.65%
-2.26%
10.39%
29.22%
16.06%
16.92%
BCC
-0.32%
-10.85%
4.75%
4.09%
35.57%
17.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WRB vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WRB vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison
WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than BCC's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 2.40% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% | 2.79% | 0.90% |
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 4.73% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WRB vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, roughly equal to the maximum BCC drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and BCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WRB vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 4.99%, while Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WRB vs. BCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities