WRB vs. BCC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC).

Performance

WRB vs. BCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WRB vs. BCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	-6.78%	23.02%	27.19%	0.25%	33.92%	27.39%	-3.14%	43.80%	5.96%	10.21%
BCC Boise Cascade Company	2.28%	-37.47%	-4.02%	106.65%	1.53%	62.14%	37.01%	59.08%	-38.36%	77.67%

Fundamentals

EPS WRB : $4.76 BCC : $3.85
PE Ratio WRB : 13.71 BCC : 19.52
PEG Ratio WRB : 0.34 BCC : 0.30
PS Ratio WRB : 1.78 BCC : 0.44
Total Revenue (TTM) WRB : $14.65B BCC : $6.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) WRB : $3.07B BCC : $780.08M
EBITDA (TTM) WRB : $2.52B BCC : $349.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than BCC's 2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed BCC with an annualized return of 17.16%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.

WRB

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -10.87%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 6M: -11.94%
• 1Y: -4.59%
• 3Y*: 19.12%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 17.16%

BCC

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: -2.43%
• 1Y: -23.29%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 18.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WRB vs. BCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB

WRB Risk / Return Rank: 28
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BCC

BCC Risk / Return Rank: 17
BCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BCC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BCC Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRB	BCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	-0.60	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	-0.76	+0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.92	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	-0.65	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	-1.10	+0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRB vs. BCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the BCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and BCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRB	BCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	-0.60	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.25	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.44	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.29	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and BCC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WRB vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than BCC's 1.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	2.85%	2.64%	2.39%	2.73%	1.22%	2.44%	0.71%	2.43%	2.83%	2.16%	2.27%	0.86%
BCC Boise Cascade Company	1.16%	1.17%	4.90%	6.73%	5.84%	7.61%	4.18%	3.75%	5.45%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WRB vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BCC drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and BCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRB	BCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.33%	-67.67%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.39%	-34.95%	+18.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.29%	-56.31%	+30.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	-56.31%	+10.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.36%	-50.08%	+34.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-22.66%	+8.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.23%	20.51%	-13.28%

Volatility

WRB vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 5.95%, while Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRB	BCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	9.61%	-3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.46%	25.90%	-9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.20%	39.17%	-16.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	40.95%	-18.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.43%	41.62%	-17.19%

Financials

WRB vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Boise Cascade Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 687.06M and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

BCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 667.30M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

BCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 15.95M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 511.03M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

BCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 19.88M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.