PortfoliosLab logo
WRB vs. BCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and BCC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WRB vs. BCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
660.48%
409.25%
WRB
BCC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WRB:

1.77

BCC:

-0.77

Sortino Ratio

WRB:

2.27

BCC:

-1.17

Omega Ratio

WRB:

1.33

BCC:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

WRB:

3.53

BCC:

-0.76

Martin Ratio

WRB:

9.29

BCC:

-1.67

Ulcer Index

WRB:

4.52%

BCC:

19.46%

Daily Std Dev

WRB:

24.00%

BCC:

38.41%

Max Drawdown

WRB:

-69.19%

BCC:

-67.67%

Current Drawdown

WRB:

-0.49%

BCC:

-41.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WRB:

$27.00B

BCC:

$3.64B

EPS

WRB:

$4.31

BCC:

$9.57

PE Ratio

WRB:

16.52

BCC:

10.05

PEG Ratio

WRB:

18.05

BCC:

1.09

PS Ratio

WRB:

1.97

BCC:

0.54

PB Ratio

WRB:

3.09

BCC:

1.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRB:

$13.96B

BCC:

$6.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRB:

$12.06B

BCC:

$2.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRB:

$2.29B

BCC:

$539.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's -24.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has outperformed BCC with an annualized return of 19.81%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.20% annualized return.


WRB

YTD

24.42%

1M

11.33%

6M

23.30%

1Y

42.27%

5Y*

28.54%

10Y*

19.81%

BCC

YTD

-24.49%

1M

-0.39%

6M

-36.18%

1Y

-29.48%

5Y*

30.98%

10Y*

14.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WRB vs. BCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WRB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WRB is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WRB is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WRB is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCC is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCC is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCC is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCC is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCC is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCC is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WRB vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the BCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and BCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.77
-0.77
WRB
BCC

Dividends

WRB vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than BCC's 6.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
1.93%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%2.79%
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
6.51%4.90%6.73%5.84%7.61%4.18%3.75%5.45%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WRB vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, roughly equal to the maximum BCC drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and BCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.49%
-41.06%
WRB
BCC

Volatility

WRB vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 7.19%, while Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a volatility of 14.33%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.19%
14.33%
WRB
BCC

Financials

WRB vs. BCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
3.53B
1.54B
(WRB) Total Revenue
(BCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WRB vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Boise Cascade Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(WRB) Gross Margin
(BCC) Gross Margin
WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.53B and revenue of 3.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 1.54B and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 538.61M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

BCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 54.52M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 417.57M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

BCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 40.35M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.