WRB vs. QQQ
WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, WRB returned 17.85%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WRB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.85%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
WRB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- -2.42%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.85%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
WRB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | -2.42% | 23.02% | 27.19% | 0.25% | 33.92% | 27.39% | -3.14% | 43.80% | 5.96% | 10.21% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRB and QQQ is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.32 |
The correlation between WRB and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WRB
QQQ
WRB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 3.44 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 12.79 | -13.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.33% | -82.97% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -11.96% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -22.77% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -35.12% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -35.12% | -10.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -0.99% | -10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -32.73% | +18.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 3.21% | +6.20% |
Volatility
WRB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 7.05%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 8.47% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 14.20% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.37% | 17.67% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 22.64% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 22.43% | +2.14% |
Dividends
WRB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 4.56% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRB and QQQ have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to WRB (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRB and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer