CNA vs. PRU
CNA (CNA Financial Corporation) and PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CNA in Insurance - Property & Casualty, PRU in Insurance - Life. Over the past 10 years, CNA returned 12.37%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for PRU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CNA vs. PRU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's -1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has outperformed PRU with an annualized return of 12.37%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
CNA
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 11.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
PRU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -2.39%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
CNA vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 4.56% | 6.96% | 23.96% | 7.14% | 3.82% | 19.07% | -5.42% | 9.47% | -11.12% | 36.94% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -1.27% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNA and PRU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001 | 0.59 |
The correlation between CNA and PRU shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNA:
$12.69B
PRU:
$37.90B
CNA:
$4.88
PRU:
$9.85
CNA:
9.61
PRU:
11.01
CNA:
0.82
PRU:
0.46
CNA:
0.86
PRU:
0.80
CNA:
$14.82B
PRU:
$47.43B
CNA:
$4.95B
PRU:
$14.72B
CNA:
$1.73B
PRU:
$4.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNA vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank
CNA
PRU
CNA vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNA | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.39 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 0.84 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNA vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and PRU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNA | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -88.53% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -21.46% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.55% | -25.66% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.67% | -33.11% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.91% | -65.89% | +19.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -9.48% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -18.30% | -7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.46% | 9.95% | -3.49% |
Volatility
CNA vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison
CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 5.76%. This indicates that CNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNA | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 5.76% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 17.52% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 22.60% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 25.72% | -4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 31.73% | -6.78% |
Dividends
CNA vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison
CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than PRU's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 8.27% | 8.04% | 7.77% | 6.81% | 8.51% | 5.15% | 8.93% | 7.59% | 7.47% | 5.84% | 7.23% | 8.53% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.07% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
Financials
CNA vs. PRU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CNA and PRU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PRU (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNA dropped -87.48% vs PRU's -88.53%.
CNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNA and PRU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer