PortfoliosLab logo
WRB vs. WMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and WMT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WRB vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WRB:

1.86

WMT:

2.25

Sortino Ratio

WRB:

2.45

WMT:

2.97

Omega Ratio

WRB:

1.35

WMT:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

WRB:

3.87

WMT:

2.43

Martin Ratio

WRB:

10.20

WMT:

7.88

Ulcer Index

WRB:

4.52%

WMT:

6.77%

Daily Std Dev

WRB:

24.11%

WMT:

24.07%

Max Drawdown

WRB:

-69.19%

WMT:

-77.24%

Current Drawdown

WRB:

0.00%

WMT:

-5.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WRB:

$28.33B

WMT:

$789.85B

EPS

WRB:

$4.35

WMT:

$2.38

PE Ratio

WRB:

17.17

WMT:

41.48

PEG Ratio

WRB:

18.38

WMT:

3.71

PS Ratio

WRB:

2.03

WMT:

1.15

PB Ratio

WRB:

3.15

WMT:

9.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRB:

$13.93B

WMT:

$519.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRB:

$13.93B

WMT:

$129.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRB:

$2.13B

WMT:

$28.91B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has outperformed WMT with an annualized return of 20.15%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively lower 17.03% annualized return.


WRB

YTD

27.79%

1M

4.93%

6M

16.97%

1Y

41.67%

3Y*

18.94%

5Y*

26.23%

10Y*

20.15%

WMT

YTD

9.83%

1M

1.59%

6M

7.51%

1Y

51.66%

3Y*

33.83%

5Y*

20.72%

10Y*

17.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


W. R. Berkley Corporation

Walmart Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WRB vs. WMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WRB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WRB is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WRB is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WRB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WMT is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WMT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WMT is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WMT is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WMT is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WMT is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WRB vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

WRB vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than WMT's 0.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
1.88%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%2.79%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.90%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%2.24%

Drawdowns

WRB vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and WMT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

WRB vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 4.34%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WRB vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
3.55B
180.55B
(WRB) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items