PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRU vs. MET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PRU vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRU vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-12.28%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%13.65%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
-9.77%-0.80%27.68%-5.49%19.23%37.43%-3.42%28.84%-15.77%21.67%

Fundamentals

EPS

PRU:

$7.39

MET:

$7.54

PE Ratio

PRU:

13.23

MET:

9.38

PEG Ratio

PRU:

0.78

MET:

0.22

PS Ratio

PRU:

0.60

MET:

0.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRU:

$57.94B

MET:

$76.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRU:

$17.33B

MET:

$12.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRU:

$3.52B

MET:

$4.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRU achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PRU has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 7.66%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


PRU

1D
3.40%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-12.28%
6M
-3.29%
1Y
-7.86%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
7.66%

MET

1D
3.59%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-9.77%
6M
-12.90%
1Y
-9.30%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRU vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MET
MET Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRU vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUMETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

-0.33

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.22

-0.26

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.96

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

-0.46

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

-1.15

+0.40

PRU vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRU Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is comparable to the MET Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRU and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUMETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

-0.33

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.23

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.35

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.24

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PRU and MET is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PRU vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than MET's 3.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
5.58%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
3.21%2.85%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%14.52%2.92%3.06%

Drawdowns

PRU vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRU drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRU and MET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUMETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.53%

-82.37%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.46%

-17.46%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-35.09%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.89%

-55.16%

-10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.58%

-16.95%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-17.71%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

7.03%

+1.66%

Volatility

PRU vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET) have volatilities of 6.63% and 6.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRUMETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

6.49%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

17.81%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.18%

28.54%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.73%

25.68%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.85%

30.74%

+1.11%

Financials

PRU vs. MET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
17.95B
23.81B
(PRU) Total Revenue
(MET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRU vs. MET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prudential Financial, Inc. and MetLife, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
30.9%
0
Portfolio components
PRU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.54B and revenue of 17.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PRU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 17.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PRU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 17.95B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 809.00M and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.