PortfoliosLab logo
PRU vs. MET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PRU and MET is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PRU vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRU:

-0.23

MET:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

PRU:

-0.04

MET:

0.82

Omega Ratio

PRU:

0.99

MET:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

PRU:

-0.20

MET:

0.65

Martin Ratio

PRU:

-0.49

MET:

2.07

Ulcer Index

PRU:

10.30%

MET:

6.94%

Daily Std Dev

PRU:

28.91%

MET:

29.40%

Max Drawdown

PRU:

-88.53%

MET:

-82.93%

Current Drawdown

PRU:

-16.38%

MET:

-7.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRU:

$37.64B

MET:

$53.67B

EPS

PRU:

$6.34

MET:

$6.12

PE Ratio

PRU:

16.77

MET:

13.06

PEG Ratio

PRU:

0.68

MET:

1.11

PS Ratio

PRU:

0.62

MET:

0.73

PB Ratio

PRU:

1.27

MET:

1.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRU:

$60.46B

MET:

$72.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRU:

$61.67B

MET:

$72.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRU:

$2.56B

MET:

$6.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRU achieves a -8.62% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PRU has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 6.67%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.


PRU

YTD

-8.62%

1M

6.75%

6M

-12.99%

1Y

-6.47%

5Y*

21.17%

10Y*

6.67%

MET

YTD

-0.37%

1M

11.48%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

13.23%

5Y*

24.56%

10Y*

8.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRU vs. MET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRU is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRU is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRU is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRU is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRU is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRU is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MET is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MET is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MET is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MET is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MET is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MET is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRU vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PRU Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the MET Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRU and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PRU vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than MET's 2.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
4.91%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%2.40%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.76%2.65%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PRU vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRU drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRU and MET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PRU vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and MetLife, Inc. (MET) have volatilities of 7.70% and 7.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PRU vs. MET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
13.47B
18.28B
(PRU) Total Revenue
(MET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRU vs. MET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prudential Financial, Inc. and MetLife, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(PRU) Gross Margin
(MET) Gross Margin
PRU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.47B and revenue of 13.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.28B and revenue of 18.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PRU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 920.00M and revenue of 13.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

PRU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prudential Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 707.00M and revenue of 13.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 945.00M and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.