PRU vs. WBA
PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) and WBA (Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.) are both stocks. PRU operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while WBA operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare). At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRU vs. WBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRU
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- -8.27%
- 6M
- -5.49%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
WBA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRU vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -8.27% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 0.00% | 28.40% | -61.34% | -25.09% | -25.06% | 35.78% | -29.38% | -10.99% | -3.65% | -10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRU and WBA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRU and WBA has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PRU:
$47.43B
WBA:
$154.58B
PRU:
$14.72B
WBA:
$26.47B
PRU:
$4.02B
WBA:
-$2.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRU vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank
PRU
WBA
PRU vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRU | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRU | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PRU vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRU | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility
PRU vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRU | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.83% | — | — |
Dividends
PRU vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison
PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, while WBA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.46% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.72% | 7.35% | 5.13% | 3.62% | 4.64% | 3.04% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.64% |
Financials
PRU vs. WBA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRU and WBA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PRU and WBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer