PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CN vs. CNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CN vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNXT

1D
-4.22%
1M
-3.05%
6M
10.97%
YTD
20.68%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
20.68%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CN and CNXT is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.63

The correlation between CN and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CN vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CN
CNXT

Financial Services

55.1%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
0.6%

Industrials

1.0%
37.5%

Energy

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

0.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

0.4%
0.9%

Technology

0.3%
44.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
1.4%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

CN
55.1%
CNXT
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CN
5.4%
CNXT
0.6%

Industrials

CN
1.0%
CNXT
37.5%

Energy

CN
0.9%
CNXT

-

Real Estate

CN
0.8%
CNXT

-

Healthcare

CN
0.8%
CNXT
3.9%

Basic Materials

CN
0.6%
CNXT
4.9%

Communication Services

CN
0.4%
CNXT
0.9%

Technology

CN
0.3%
CNXT
44.3%

Consumer Defensive

CN
0.3%
CNXT
1.4%

Utilities

CN
0.2%
CNXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CN vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CN vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNCNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.67

CN vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CN vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

Volatility

CN vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNCNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.98%

CN vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CN vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.15%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CN and CNXT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.

CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.65% for CNXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CN and CNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer