CN vs. FBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY).
CN and FBY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. FBY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 27, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CN or FBY.
Key characteristics
| CN | FBY | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 88.19% | 25.65% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.00% | -15.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.00% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and FBY is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CN vs. FBY - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CN vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
CN vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison
CN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17,634.69%, more than FBY's 54.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 17,634.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 54.20% | 8.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CN vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CN drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, which is greater than FBY's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CN and FBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CN vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) at 5.53%. This indicates that CN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.