CN vs. FBY

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares, while FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CN is passively managed, while FBY is actively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FBY.

Performance

CN vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FBY

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -4.56%
• 6M: -21.00%
• YTD: -15.55%
• 1Y: -24.10%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF	$1.42M	$1.53M	$1.62M

CN vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-10.50%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF	-15.55%	1.98%	44.42%	17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CN and FBY is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023	0.10

Return for Risk

CN vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CN vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CN	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.81	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.87	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.88	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.61	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CN	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.53%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.56%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CN	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	32.93%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.49%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.49%	—

CN vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CN vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF	62.78%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CN and FBY in my portfolio?

CN and FBY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CN or FBY?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CN or FBY?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CN or FBY?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 62.78%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between CN and FBY?

CN is categorized as China Equities, while FBY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.99% for FBY.