CN vs. FBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY).
CN and FBY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. FBY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 27, 2023.
Performance
CN vs. FBY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CN vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -14.39% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -12.51% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -10.82%
- YTD
- -12.51%
- 6M
- -21.11%
- 1Y
- -6.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CN vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank
CN
FBY
CN vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CN | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.57 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and FBY is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CN vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison
CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.87%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 58.87% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CN vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CN | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -24.81% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.09% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.21% | — |
Volatility
CN vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CN | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 32.41% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 28.40% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 28.40% | — |